Home
> Medical/Health Commentary > Model Marketing (and New Hampshire’s $4,300 cheek swabs)
Comments (0)
Trackbacks (0)
Leave a comment
Trackback
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Contact the author
notwithstandingblog at gmail [dot] comAround the Twitterverse
- Ah, #quebec, la belle province, where even snow removal is a criminal racket. bit.ly/JtTzOT 1 year ago
- @petersuderman Better to wean the moon from its dependence on dirty unreliable foreign planetary oil by 2100. Drill the Sea of Tranquility! 1 year ago
- @medrants Great post! If the US is really trying to "steal" doctors, it's failing miserably. bit.ly/yUxgtd bit.ly/zgOkuL 1 year ago
- RT @IJ: We just sued the #IRS. Watch our video to find out why: youtube.com/watch?v=0-1IEq… PLS RT!! 1 year ago
- Come on, Wordpress, "select all" does NOT mean "select every other paragraph." #fail 1 year ago
- More fun facts on how US healthcare compares to other countries, via @DisMgtCareBlog bit.ly/zMDcVH 1 year ago
- US infant and perinatal mortality not as bad as alleged by many on left, others. Via @ATuteur @BMJ_latest bit.ly/wt3iyg 1 year ago
- From @KevinMD, a bleak look at the future of #primarycare bit.ly/wOh0MW 1 year ago
- @aviksaroy Great idea to integrate VA into rest of the system. I also didn't know you went to medical school until reading this article! 1 year ago
- Campaign-finance restrictions as a cause of political polarization? econ.st/znc1xU 1 year ago
Archives
Tags
aamc
aco
American Medical Association
american medical student
American Medical Student Association
amsa
Association of American Medical Colleges
blog carnivals
canada
cancer
Conflict of interest
economics
Electronic medical record
ethics
finance
genetics
Health policy
immigration
insurance
investment
liberties
links
malpractice
markets
medical business
medical education
medicare
mental health
meta
nutrition
overmedicalization
Patch Adams
pcmh
pharmaceuticals
physician payment
physician supply
politics
primary care
Quackery
radiology
regulation
research
risk
Stark Law
technology
Categories
Medical Blogs
- A Cartoon Guide to Becoming a Doctor
- A Happy Hospitalist
- Bittersweet Medicine
- Buckeye Surgeon
- DB's Medical Rants
- Disease Management Care Blog
- Dr. Grumpy
- Dr. Wes
- Edwin Leap
- ER Stories
- Great Z's
- GruntDoc
- Health Affairs Blog
- Health Business Blog
- KevinMD
- MD Whistleblower
- Movin' Meat
- Musings of a Distractible Mind
- NYT Prescriptions
- Science-Based Medicine
- The Covert Rationing Blog
- WSJ Health Blog
Policy/Economics/Law Blogs
- Carpe Diem
- Coyote Blog
- Democracy in America
- Economics of Contempt
- Free Exchange
- Greg Mankiw's Blog
- Healthcare Economist
- InsureBlog
- Jeffrey Miron
- John Goodman's Health Policy Blog
- Managed Care Matters
- Megan McArdle
- New York Personal Injury Law Blog
- NYT Economix
- Overlawyered
- Popehat
- Reason's Hit & Run
- Robert Reich
- Simple Justice
- The Apothecary
- The Becker-Posner Blog
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- Worthwhile Canadian Initiative
Model Marketing (and New Hampshire’s $4,300 cheek swabs)
I have been asked many times to register for bone marrow donor registries. I’m told that there are severe shortages of potential donors from my ethnic group, and that ethnicity correlates with the probability of successful match. I’ve been solicited again and again over email listservs in college and here at medical school, reminded of the life-saving potential of a simple cheek swab (and subsequent marrow harvesting, if matched). One particularly aggressive college classmate told the assembled masses that ”choosing not to donate is essentially deciding to let somebody die. And, yes, you are responsible for that.”
Strong words, those.
However, I have never been asked to register as a bone marrow donor by ”flirtatious models in heels, short skirts, and lab coats.” Not that I would have found that approach particularly persuasive.
What might seem, at first glance, like an innovative approach taken from the playbook of marketing professionals, has instead been depicted as a nefarious attempt to scam insurers out of around $4000 per cheek swab tested.
How absurd! This group should be lauded for their efforts to increase the pool of potential bone marrow donors! That non-profits and charities are adopting the for-profit sector’s successful marketing techniques is a sign of progress, not nefarious intent!
Here’s a thought for New Hampshire’s ”senior assistant attorney general:” there would be no need to investigate and vilify this group for…. I don’t even know exactly. The article doesn’t imply they’ve done anything illegal or unethical. They seem to have simply billed insurers as the law allows them to.
This is one of those problems that seems like it could only be caused by idiotic regulation. Getting a cheek swab and tested for bone marrow donor registration is clearly not a risk against which one needs to be insured. It’s an elective procedure that has absolutely zero health benefit for the insured party. New Hampshire’s legislators, in their infinite wisdom, decided to mandate coverage anyways.
And somehow the Times portrays the models as the most unseemly part of this saga.
Share this:
Like this: