Home
> Medical/Health Commentary > Model Marketing (and New Hampshire’s $4,300 cheek swabs)
Comments (0)
Trackbacks (0)
Leave a comment
Trackback
Join 16 other subscribers
Contact the author
notwithstandingblog at gmail [dot] com
Archives
Tags
aamc aco American Medical Association american medical student American Medical Student Association amsa Association of American Medical Colleges blog carnivals canada cancer Conflict of interest economics Electronic medical record ethics finance genetics Health policy history immigration insurance investment liberties links malpractice markets mcat medical business medical education medicare mental health meta nutrition overmedicalization Patch Adams pcmh pharmaceuticals physician payment Physicians for a National Health Program physician supply politics primary care Quackery radiology regulation research risk Stark Law technology unions usmleCategories
Medical Blogs
- A Cartoon Guide to Becoming a Doctor
- A Happy Hospitalist
- Bittersweet Medicine
- Buckeye Surgeon
- DB's Medical Rants
- Disease Management Care Blog
- Dr. Grumpy
- Dr. Wes
- Edwin Leap
- ER Stories
- Great Z's
- GruntDoc
- Health Affairs Blog
- Health Business Blog
- KevinMD
- MD Whistleblower
- Movin' Meat
- Musings of a Distractible Mind
- NYT Prescriptions
- Science-Based Medicine
- The Covert Rationing Blog
- WSJ Health Blog
Policy/Economics/Law Blogs
- Carpe Diem
- Coyote Blog
- Democracy in America
- Economics of Contempt
- Free Exchange
- Greg Mankiw's Blog
- Healthcare Economist
- InsureBlog
- Jeffrey Miron
- John Goodman's Health Policy Blog
- Managed Care Matters
- Megan McArdle
- New York Personal Injury Law Blog
- NYT Economix
- Overlawyered
- Popehat
- Reason's Hit & Run
- Robert Reich
- Simple Justice
- The Apothecary
- The Becker-Posner Blog
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- Worthwhile Canadian Initiative
Model Marketing (and New Hampshire’s $4,300 cheek swabs)
I have been asked many times to register for bone marrow donor registries. I’m told that there are severe shortages of potential donors from my ethnic group, and that ethnicity correlates with the probability of successful match. I’ve been solicited again and again over email listservs in college and here at medical school, reminded of the life-saving potential of a simple cheek swab (and subsequent marrow harvesting, if matched). One particularly aggressive college classmate told the assembled masses that ”choosing not to donate is essentially deciding to let somebody die. And, yes, you are responsible for that.”
Strong words, those.
However, I have never been asked to register as a bone marrow donor by ”flirtatious models in heels, short skirts, and lab coats.” Not that I would have found that approach particularly persuasive.
What might seem, at first glance, like an innovative approach taken from the playbook of marketing professionals, has instead been depicted as a nefarious attempt to scam insurers out of around $4000 per cheek swab tested.
How absurd! This group should be lauded for their efforts to increase the pool of potential bone marrow donors! That non-profits and charities are adopting the for-profit sector’s successful marketing techniques is a sign of progress, not nefarious intent!
Here’s a thought for New Hampshire’s ”senior assistant attorney general:” there would be no need to investigate and vilify this group for…. I don’t even know exactly. The article doesn’t imply they’ve done anything illegal or unethical. They seem to have simply billed insurers as the law allows them to.
This is one of those problems that seems like it could only be caused by idiotic regulation. Getting a cheek swab and tested for bone marrow donor registration is clearly not a risk against which one needs to be insured. It’s an elective procedure that has absolutely zero health benefit for the insured party. New Hampshire’s legislators, in their infinite wisdom, decided to mandate coverage anyways.
And somehow the Times portrays the models as the most unseemly part of this saga.
Share this:
Related